Re: Upended quantum physics in the news
- From: kim@xxxxxxxxxxx (Kim G. S. Øyhus)
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:28:07 +0000 (UTC)
In article <45ktm1F74imaU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Robert J. Kolker <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lee Jay wrote:
Glenn wrote:
That our personal computers work does not evidence that quantum
mechanics is "basically correct".
Trivia question. What simple device is owned by virtually everyone in
the modern world (I have hundreds of them) and wouldn't work *at all*
without a totally counter-intuitive property of quantum mechanics, and
what is that property?
A transistor?
Bob Kolker
Yet another right answer.
The transistor was developed from the concept of positrons, and
applied to solid state physics, resulting in charged holes. All
quantum mechanics.
Kim0, (And I am a quantum mechanic, by the way.)
Kim0
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Upended quantum physics in the news
- From: Lee Jay
- Re: Upended quantum physics in the news
- References:
- Upended quantum physics in the news
- From: Glenn
- Re: Upended quantum physics in the news
- From: Glenn
- Re: Upended quantum physics in the news
- From: Lee Jay
- Upended quantum physics in the news
- Prev by Date: Re: Letter to the Editor: The truth of ID is self-evident
- Next by Date: Re: evolution of sex
- Previous by thread: Re: Upended quantum physics in the news
- Next by thread: Re: Upended quantum physics in the news
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading