Re: It's Gumby Damnit!

In message <1139709889.308638.268260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Gerard" <markgerardcat@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Comeon Bob, stop nitpicking!!

I'll gladly accept an 8,500 year old bristlecone pine. Afterall, it
better fits with the actual age of the earth in relation to the
biblical genealogies associated with the patriarchs, a much more
accurate way of determining human history. This goes back as long as
11,000 years ago. So I'm happy with any tree under 10,000 years old,
which is still living. It strongly suggests that an event prevented
the aging to go back beyond Eden.

You better check out your sources on the pines too.

Perhaps you had better check your sources. You are, after all, the one
who's claiming they exist all over the world.

Perhaps you should also check out the 12,000 year old creosote bushes.

Regarding what is the "fall", it's original sin.

Regarding the one continent, as another poster pointed out, I am off
biblically on this, it was just a few hundred years after the global
flood.

Regarding my stadium like structure of earth, the evidence supports
it.

Which evidence would that be?

We have in my scenario, icey regions on the outermost parts melting
rapidly as forty days of rain falls, we have the division of these
mountains later on, causing the ice glaciers rapid movements, which
evidence reveals all around, contain boulders from different
continents. I'll soon present a list of these islands and shores
which contain rock layers from thousands of miles apart, and which
were errantly attributed to gradual ice age movements. The arguement
will show how gradual movements cannot explain the larger 10 ton
boulders.

Should we be looking forward to this as much as we are looking forward
to Ray's article which will (he assures us) totally demolish
"evolutionism"?

Because the fact of the matter is that these boulders would've
settled and nestled into regions within a hundred or so miles of the
continents they were a part of. Slightly offshore. My arguement is
that they were all driven there by an almighty force, which seperated
the continents while leaving traces of this event.

And all this while leaving evidence that makes it look as if the flood
never occurred, and that the Earth is 4.5 Billion years old. Your god
is certainly very clever, even if he is a deceiver on a grand scale.

There's so much out there to discover, Why do all of you (dead set on
evolution folks) get out of that niche you are comfortable with and
learn the real history of earth?

Or put another way: why don't you (who claim to be a caholic and yet
spend all your time claiming that the supposedly infallible pope has
got it wrong in any number of ways) get out of that creationist niche
and look at some of the evidence?

--
Nick Roberts tigger @ orpheusinternet.co.uk

Hanlon's Razor: Never attribute to malice that which
can be adequately explained by stupidity.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: BBC the creationist at the museum
    ... Or any other evidence you may care to bring ... if we use this record the earth is ... used by REAL scientists to get geological dates, ... that you can claim that astrophysics must be wrong about the age of stars ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: BBC the creationist at the museum
    ... Or any other evidence you may care to bring ... if we use this record the earth is ... used by REAL scientists to get geological dates, ... that you can claim that astrophysics must be wrong about the age of stars ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: BBC the creationist at the museum
    ... Or any other evidence you may care to bring ... if we use this record the earth is ... used by REAL scientists to get geological dates, ... that you can claim that astrophysics must be wrong about the age of stars ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: BBC the creationist at the museum
    ... Or any other evidence you may care to bring ... if we use this record (since God was there and I wasn`t) the earth is ... that you can claim that astrophysics must be wrong about the age of stars ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: BBC the creationist at the museum
    ... Or any other evidence you may care to bring ... if we use this record the earth is ... used by REAL scientists to get geological dates, ... that you can claim that astrophysics must be wrong about the age of stars ...
    (talk.origins)