Re: Herr Haeckel
- From: "Richard Forrest" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Feb 2006 14:35:10 -0800
mccoy@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
RF,
No doubt the smaller the individual the closer the resemblance, in some
respects. No doubt since the back bone of homo sapiens is part of the
central nervous system, it had to be developed first. Naturally
evolutionists have supressed this fact in favor of pointing out the
inadvertant similarity that this causes - being that since the backbone
is larger and projects outward, somehow this becomes evidence for a
"tail" even though no tail is present.
So much for the similarity! The apparent similarities are facile and
structurally do not add up.
JM
So all those embryologists working for 150 years and more are wrong!
How do you explain pharygeal arches? And perhaps you can explain why
human embryos develop a tail in the early stages, but reabsorb it to
produce the coxyx?
Of course, I know that you won't, but I'm sure that your response will
provide us all with amusement.
RF
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Herr Haeckel
- From: mccoy
- Re: Herr Haeckel
- References:
- Herr Haeckel
- From: mccoy
- Re: Herr Haeckel
- From: Richard Forrest
- Re: Herr Haeckel
- From: mccoy
- Herr Haeckel
- Prev by Date: Re: Text of Wisconsin Pseudo-Science Prevention Act
- Next by Date: Re: Herr Haeckel
- Previous by thread: Re: Herr Haeckel
- Next by thread: Re: Herr Haeckel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|