Re: Letter to the Editor: The truth of ID is self-evident
- From: Mark Isaak <eciton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 01:45:29 GMT
On 11 Feb 2006 08:59:17 -0800, "rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx"
<rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...] There also is no
such number as 22/7. The numerator of a fraction can only be a smaller
number, and furthermore 7 is a prime, so it does not divide.
Very wrong. The numerator and denominator of a fraction can be any
size, provided the denominator is not zero. In grade school, we were
taught that numerators were smaller than denominators in "proper"
fractions, but I have learned from experience that such teaching is
hogwash. "22/7" is much easier to deal with when doing actual
calculations than the equivalent "3 and 1/7" that Mrs. Northon
insisted was the correct answer.
And yes, 7 does divide 22. It does not do so evenly, but numbers are
sometimes like that. And it does not matter that 7 is prime; 21/7
would divide evenly, and 7 is just as prime there.
--
Mark Isaak eciton (at) earthlink (dot) net
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
exposing the country to danger." -- Hermann Goering
.
- References:
- Letter to the Editor: The truth of ID is self-evident
- From: Jason Spaceman
- Re: Letter to the Editor: The truth of ID is self-evident
- From: rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Letter to the Editor: The truth of ID is self-evident
- From: rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
- Letter to the Editor: The truth of ID is self-evident
- Prev by Date: Re: It's Gumby Damnit!
- Next by Date: Re: All Evidence is Subjective...
- Previous by thread: Re: Letter to the Editor: The truth of ID is self-evident
- Next by thread: Re: Letter to the Editor: The truth of ID is self-evident
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|