Re: A scientific theory against God and morality

Vacaous reasoning. Scientists don't have to answer any "why" question
at all, so don't ask me why. Physicists don't have to answer why rocks
fall either.

You don't have to calculate comparisons in a simulation. Regardless if
the result is reproduction or no reproduction, the outcome is the
basically neccessary consequent of the interaction of the individual
with the environment, the result is not the consequent of any
comparison. There are no comparisons in nature, there is no struggle,
that is just sumperimposed on nature by Darwinism.

When Darwinists look to a meadow of grass they see a struggle of all
against all for reproduction in their imagination. What is actually
happening is grass working for what they do not know, all approaching
certain death, the one reproducing as a neccesary consequence of it's
interaction with the environment, the other not reproducing as a
neccessary consequence of the interaction with their environment. There
is no magical force of struggle between those that do, and those that
do not reproduce, it is all of neccessity. That is reality.

Essentially Darwinists are descibing two instances of the
preservationist logic of natural selection, one instance of being
selected against, and one instance of being selected for. Then they
muddle those 2 instances together as one by a comparison, differential
reproductive success, and then declare that to be the basic logic of
the way nature works in regards to reproduction and form.

It is proven that the preservationist logic is beyond doubt. You can
only hope to make a sophisticated use of that basic logic. But we can
easily see all possible permutations in which this basic logic may be
applied, it doesn't really add any significant meaning to emphasize
some permutation of the basic logic. And emphasizing a permutation of
the basic logic that way, mainly tends to destroy the unity of our
understanding of nature, in regards to reproduction and form.

regards,
Mohammad Nor Syamsu

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Replica/Reproduction parts Attorney Fund Complete
    ... Is it legal to create reproduction parts in the United States? ... outside the US & sell them within the US? ... When do copyrights of the various nature expire? ... If you own the original mold for a part, do you have the right to ...
    (rec.games.pinball)
  • Re: Replica/Reproduction parts Attorney Fund Complete
    ... Is it legal to create reproduction parts in the United States? ... When do copyrights of the various nature expire? ... If you own the original mold for a part, do you have the right to make ... If you own the original mold for a part, do you have the right to sell ...
    (rec.games.pinball)
  • Re: Information theory and the evolution of altruism
    ... Survival of the individual is not all that concerns nature! ... is only concerned with maximizing the total number of fertile forms each ... Survival and reproduction have to ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: A scientific theory against God and morality
    ... anybody seen a comparison in nature like Hershey has? ... If we allow natural selection as some kind of basic law of nature, ... giving us a unity in understanding of nature in regards to reproduction ...
    (talk.origins)