Re: All Evidence is Subjective...
- From: jwsheffield@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 9 Feb 2006 10:43:46 -0800
raven1 wrote:
On 8 Feb 2006 07:13:34 -0800, roger_pearse@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
and no historical record of such Gospel events as the Slaughter of the Innocents that
would surely have caught the attention of even secular historians.
Argument from silence.
Hardly; simply an observation that the rather outlandish claims made
in the Gospels are completely uncorroborated.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
Since you like the argument from silence, I
shall give a greater argument from silence.
Matthew was published in the ancient world
in Aramaic, Greek, Coptic(both Southern and Northern
Egyptian versions), Vetus Latin, and other versions.
Are you telling me no Roman official was as smart
as you and interviewed clans from Bethlehem. The
people who ran the Roman Empire were no dummies.
May I ask what Empire you have run?
Jim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: All Evidence is Subjective...
- From: raven1
- Re: All Evidence is Subjective...
- References:
- All Evidence is Subjective...
- From: Gerard
- Re: All Evidence is Subjective...
- From: Deadrat
- Re: All Evidence is Subjective...
- From: Gerard
- Re: All Evidence is Subjective...
- From: raven1
- Re: All Evidence is Subjective...
- From: roger_pearse
- All Evidence is Subjective...
- Prev by Date: Re: In the News: T. rex's weird-looking ancestor found
- Next by Date: Re: Letter to the Editor: Closing the door on ID robs students ofpossible answers
- Previous by thread: Re: All Evidence is Subjective...
- Next by thread: Re: All Evidence is Subjective...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|