Re: To John Drayton, re MC
- From: B Richardson <brich@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 02:33:51 GMT
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 02:09:25 GMT, Zoe <muze10@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07 Feb 2006 10:35:04 GMT, poiuy@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric Rowley) wrote:
snip>
If the melt doesn't homogonize you don't get an isochron with a
steeper slope, you get random datapoints that don't form a
straight line (isochron).
but what if the melt has retained its original ratios, then when
crystals are re-formed, they could pull isotopes in the same original
ratios as those already present in the melt, with a little scatter to
be expected.
The daughter product isn't an element thats a suitable candidate
for inclusion into the crystal. Zircons in particular strongly
discriminate against lead when forming , but are happy
with uranium which has a lead isotope at the end of the
decay chain.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: To John Drayton, re MC
- From: B Richardson
- Re: To John Drayton, re MC
- References:
- Re: To John Drayton, re MC
- From: Zoe
- Re: To John Drayton, re MC
- From: Eric Rowley
- Re: To John Drayton, re MC
- From: Zoe
- Re: To John Drayton, re MC
- Prev by Date: Re: Truism about creationism
- Next by Date: Re: Islam and History
- Previous by thread: Re: To John Drayton, re MC
- Next by thread: Re: To John Drayton, re MC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|