All Evidence is Subjective...

Face it. All you need is a goal or an agenda, and then a shovel,
microscope, and bunch of peers with the same agenda.

A bunch of doubting thomases begin to dictate THEIR SUBJECTIVE idea of
what evidence fits the discerning criteria for defining origins of
mankind and all of life. Or something to that effect.

I don't believe in God, I won't accept the mountain of evidence
presented to me and the rest of civilization for creation, so I rewrite
the discerning criteria. I limit it to a purely natural basis of
discernment. Thus, ignoring all of the relative evidence for God.

Forget about an 8 thousand year history of revelation through proper
channels. Forget about the historical facts which clearly reveal the
biblical settings as reality of their times. Forget about the
tradition, such as Jewish, who hold all of the same truths as other
traditions (Catholicism) but only differ in areas of theological
interpretation. Forget about the clearly present, to the natural human
eyesight or vantage point, the distinctive beauty of creation as well
as the design, and detail in design which declare intelligent creator.
Forget about the authenticativeness of the divine law, in how if
practiced perfectly, would benefit the human race in every way,
including elimination of natural death. Forget about our intuitive
knowledge of that divine authority, and the concious awareness of good
from evil. Forget about these and many other relative evidences
declaring God's obvious existence and omnipresence in this world.

Let's limit the discerning criteria to natural evidence. What do you
expect to find? Nature, nature, nature.......Natural evolution.

No. It's creation in a generative metamorphic process which relates
with the elongated version of evolution, however, time and cause is
different. God doesn't need to reveal the hows and whens of creation
process, but very clearly revealed the fact of creation. Surely, such
an immense God and His Creation couldn't be mentally comprehended by
us, nor would those details be relevant in our purpose for existence.

Scientists use things such as similar structures, genetics, fossil
likeness, fossil distribution, distribution of species, in geological
layers and geographical, as well as living distribution of species,
apparant extinctions to the point of 90% of all life, microscopic
strains evolving or changing called mutations, carnavorism, disease,
due to lack of observed change they resort to a lengthy and slow
process, interpret findings accordingly, use radiological tests which
fit the current timeframe theory, use a time marker which is clearly
guesswork(isotope ratios a point of creation) and many similiar ideas
to build their case and argue it. With so many tools to build with,
they can change at whim when a certain area is debunked.

They are as elusive as the mutated bacterias, viral strains, and
cancers. However, those things which evolve and change were ordered by
the creator to be elusive, so as to keep death and disease as a
constant truth and consequences of original sin, and a call to
redemption in the cultivation or salvation program by God.

The evolutionists remain elusive, only to decieve themselves and
innocent children in our educational systems, to plant their seed of
doubt, and to undermine Gods clearly revealed, clearly obvious creation
and work in cultivating the souls of the earth for a merit eternal
spiritual state.

They, in their subjective search for alternative evidence, subject
themselves to a horrible judgement day due to their daily and lifelong
sins of omission.

But God forgives all sins. So theres still time to repent.

.

Relevant Pages