Re: Non-claims
- From: "Iain" <iain_inkster@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jan 2006 11:22:18 -0800
John Harshman wrote:
> Iain wrote:
>
> > John Harshman wrote:
> >
> >>Iain wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Maybe these ought to be catalogued and numbered?
> >>>I've responded to corrections and criticism with the following
> >>>refinements. The original was a bit sloppy and ambiguous.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Evolutionary theory does notclaim:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>That mutation more unlikely than ordinary variation is important.
> >>
> >>Some evolutionary theorists claim this.
> >
> >
> > Sorry, forgot about this one.
> >
> > Who did you have in mind?
>
> Many of the folks who like punk eek take this position, that variation
> within species is different in kind from variation between species. If
> you want to get more drastic, there are Goldschmidt and Schindewolf, and
> even Gould flirted with macromutation a bit. It's enjoyed a bit of a
> comeback with some of the evo-devo folks, who think that homeotic
> mutations can work a major change in phenotype instantly, and that this
> is important in evolution. I don't think there's much to it myself, but
> it's not an extinct view by any means.
It took me half an hour to work out you meant Punctuated Equilibria.
Now who's being unclear :-P
Anyway, surely it would be unreasonable to suggest that macromutation
is necessary for speciation, given that we are supposed to have
observed speciation without Punc' Eq'.
~Iain
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Non-claims
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Non-claims
- From: Iain
- Re: Non-claims
- References:
- Non-claims
- From: Iain
- Re: Non-claims
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Non-claims
- From: Iain
- Re: Non-claims
- From: John Harshman
- Non-claims
- Prev by Date: Re: talk.origins darwinists lie about the holocaust
- Next by Date: Re: Did Darwinism Smooth the Way for Nazi Ideology?
- Previous by thread: Re: Non-claims
- Next by thread: Re: Non-claims
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|