Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: John Harshman <jharshman.diespamdie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 19:08:30 GMT
Glenn wrote:
[snip]
>
> Sean, this may be of interest to you. Perhaps you have not seen it in
> the news.
>
> http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/newsrel/science/mcirreversible.asp
>
> "UCSD Biologists Find New Evidence for One-Way Evolution"
>
> [...]
> "This is the strongest evidence yet to support irreversibility," said
> Joshua Kohn, an associate professor of biology at UCSD who headed the
> study. "If we had not used the genetic data coding for this
> reproductive mechanism and only inferred the pattern of evolution
> based on the traits of living species, we would have come to the
> opposite conclusion and with high statistical support - that the trait
> evolved more than once."
>
> [...]
>
> "Irreversible loss of complex traits, which result from the combined
> interaction of several genes, is an old and at times controversial
> scientific question. While the late evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay
> Gould popularized the hypothesis of irreversibility, known as Dollo's
> Law, studies that use current methods to reconstruct the evolution of
> complex traits often fail to support it. This is because it is often
> difficult to reconstruct characteristics of extinct ancestors with any
> certainty."
>
> "The study contradicts earlier studies of complex trait evolution,
> which have tended to favor multiple reappearances of complex traits
> after these organs were lost in ancestral species. The authors suggest
> that traditional methods for reconstructing the history of trait
> evolution may be inaccurate."
Interesting study. Why do you think it's relevant to what Sean is
talking about?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: Glenn
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- References:
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: Seanpit
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: hersheyhv
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: Seanpit
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: hersheyhv
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: Seanpit
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: hersheyhv
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: Seanpit
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: Seanpit
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: z
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: Seanpit
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: RobinGoodfellow
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: Seanpit
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: RobinGoodfellow
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: Seanpit
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: RobinGoodfellow
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: Seanpit
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- From: Glenn
- Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- Prev by Date: Re: Open invitation to IDers - What argument would you use to justify ID should be taught in science classes.
- Next by Date: Re: Supernatural is Natural
- Previous by thread: Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- Next by thread: Re: For Kim G. S. Øyhus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|