Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- From: "Dana Tweedy" <reddfrogg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 03:47:37 GMT
"Walter Bushell" <proto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:proto-4C13AB.18554423012006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <8iaBf.4342$rH5.2747@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Dana Tweedy" <reddfrogg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> "Walter Bushell" <proto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:proto-F78D82.10580623012006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> snip
>>
>> >> >> He was a furriner. And not even Christian.
>> >> >>
>> >> > And what he wrote was Greek to me.
>> >>
>> >> I'm sorry, but you're being obtuse. This means, of course, that your
>> >> two friends must be pretty damn sharp.
>> >> `
>> >
>> > You're a pip for figuring the angles.
>>
>> It's a sine of the times.
>>
>>
>> DJT
>
> An arc sine surely.
Just as sure as laying in the sun will make you a tan gent
DJT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- From: Ye Old One
- Re: Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- References:
- What is a recessive gene?
- From: Gary Bohn
- Hawking and distance of stars
- From: mccoy
- Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- From: wf3h
- Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- From: VoiceOfReason
- Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- From: Walter Bushell
- Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- From: Pip R. Lagenta
- Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- From: Walter Bushell
- Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- From: Dana Tweedy
- Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- From: Walter Bushell
- What is a recessive gene?
- Prev by Date: South Carolina: Decision on how to teach evolution in the classroom postponed
- Next by Date: Re: Judge Jones In A Nutshell:
- Previous by thread: Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- Next by thread: Re: Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading