Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- From: "Dana Tweedy" <reddfrogg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:30:30 GMT
<mccoy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1137956266.939400.21120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> It's interesting that Hawking states that the distance of distant
> galaxies could not be known at one time because of the lack of
> parallax. Yet, he claims that because the luminosity of nearby stars
> and that their parallax could be known, thereby the distance of distant
> galaxies could be known through their luminosity.
>
> The problem with this idea is that the parallax of nearby stars cannot
> be known.
As has been explained to you numerous times, the parallax of nearby stars is
easily calculated. See:
http://www.astronomy.com/ASY/CS/forums/274087/PrintPost.aspx
http://www.encyclopedia.com/html/p1/parallax.asp
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/parallax.html
Even grade school science students can do this:
http://www.usc.edu/CSSF/History/2004/Projects/S1511.pdf#search='parallax%20calculation'
DJT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- From: mccoy
- Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- References:
- What is a recessive gene?
- From: Gary Bohn
- Hawking and distance of stars
- From: mccoy
- What is a recessive gene?
- Prev by Date: Re: the cambrian "explosion"
- Next by Date: Re: Evolutionary Future of Humanity (was Supernatural Is Natural)
- Previous by thread: Hawking and distance of stars
- Next by thread: Re: Hawking and distance of stars
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|