Hawking and distance of stars


It's interesting that Hawking states that the distance of distant
galaxies could not be known at one time because of the lack of
parallax. Yet, he claims that because the luminosity of nearby stars
and that their parallax could be known, thereby the distance of distant
galaxies could be known through their luminosity.

The problem with this idea is that the parallax of nearby stars cannot
be known.


JM

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Does Hubble have to die?
    ... Calibrating Stellar Models with the Pleiades: Resolving the Distance ... ZAMS stars in our sample without the additional uncertainties ... roll constraints at times of maximum parallax factor. ... necessary to observe these fields through at least two paralliptic ...
    (sci.space.shuttle)
  • Re: Hawking and distance of stars
    ... he claims that because the luminosity of nearby stars ... >>> and that their parallax could be known, thereby the distance of distant ... >> alias Ernest Major ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Hawking and distance of stars
    ... >> It's interesting that Hawking states that the distance of distant ... he claims that because the luminosity of nearby stars ... >> and that their parallax could be known, ... > This can be done by cartographers on earth measuring the earth. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Hawking and distance of stars
    ... he claims that because the luminosity of nearby stars ... >and that their parallax could be known, thereby the distance of distant ... >galaxies could be known through their luminosity. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Hawking and distance of stars
    ... he claims that because the luminosity of nearby stars ... >and that their parallax could be known, thereby the distance of distant ... >galaxies could be known through their luminosity. ...
    (talk.origins)