Re: funny creationsist
- From: josephus <dogbird@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:28:30 GMT
roger_pearse@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Ken Rode wrote:
>
>>roger_pearse@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>>Likewise the forgery of dollar bills is a constant presence in our
>>>society. Only a fool would turn down a collection by his workmates on
>>>such a ground.
>>
>>Roger, while I will agree that Jack's post was short on facts, your
>>reply was no better. I'd like to be able to learn something here, but
>>there is simply too much rhetoric and not enough substance. Do you have
>>anything concrete to add?
>
>
> Thanks for your note. Unfortunately such a post as Jack's twists the
> subject so much that it is difficult to do much more than point out the
> poisoning. One has to start again, on clean soil. Pardon me if I
> don't write a book!
>
> On Mithras, I collect ancient literary references. All those known to
> me -- and I think it's pretty much all that exist -- are available
> online at:
>
> http://www.tertullian.org/rpearse/mithras.
>
>>>From this we can quickly judge how much of what is said about Mithras
> is derived from ancient sources, and how much is modern malicious
> mythologising.
>
> All the best,
>
> Roger Pearse
>
actually do you have any reliable summaries?
josephus
.
- References:
- Re: funny creationsist
- From: Jim Spaza
- Re: funny creationsist
- From: jack . mollier
- Re: funny creationsist
- From: Jim Spaza
- Re: funny creationsist
- From: jack . mollier
- Re: funny creationsist
- From: roger_pearse
- Re: funny creationsist
- From: Ken Rode
- Re: funny creationsist
- From: roger_pearse
- Re: funny creationsist
- Prev by Date: Re: In the News: Explaining the unexplainable
- Next by Date: Re: In the News: Explaining the unexplainable
- Previous by thread: Re: funny creationsist
- Next by thread: Re: funny creationsist
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|