Re: T.O. is quite the pro-evolution nursery.
- From: Bob Casanova <nospam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 18:43:14 -0500
On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 01:45:39 GMT, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by NashtOn <nana@xxxxx>:
<snip>
>Keep in mind that the ToE is still nothing but a theory.
"Nothing but" a theory, huh? Tell us, O confused one, just
what that means in science. Based on your phrasing, I doubt
you know.
> Is it
>falsifiable? No.
Wrong. A number of ways in which it could be falsified have
been posted repeatedly; one of the more blatant would be for
a cat to give birth to a dog, as some fundamentalists insist
in their smug ignorance is *required* by the theory.
The fact that it hasn't been falsified doesn't mean it can't
be.
> Is it something that can explain the increasing
>complexity it is supposed to predict? No.
Incorrect premise. Increasing complexity (in the sense in
which you appear to mean it) is not universal (check up on
"tapeworm" for evidence), and the ToE predicts neither
increasing nor decreasing complexity; it predicts average
increasing levels of adaptation, *as a group*, to the
current environment of that group.
<snip>
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
.
- References:
- T.O. is quite the pro-evolution nursery.
- From: Gary Bohn
- Re: T.O. is quite the pro-evolution nursery.
- From: NashtOn
- T.O. is quite the pro-evolution nursery.
- Prev by Date: Re: peacefulspirits
- Next by Date: Re: The Logos Anals
- Previous by thread: Re: T.O. is quite the pro-evolution nursery.
- Next by thread: Re: T.O. is quite the pro-evolution nursery.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|