Re: A Scientific Theory Based on Two Intelligent Design Entities

rev. goetz:
You need to be clearer with your language. I now understand that you
are saying that E-Matrix is the product of ID. But before I thought
that you were saying that E-Matrix is an intelligent designer.

I am not saying that I agree with you. But I think that I understand
your basic claim.

Kenseto:
The title of this thread is 'A scientific theory based on two
intelligent designed entities'. I don't see how you can be confused
that the E-Matrix is the intelligent designer.

Ken Seto

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A Scientific Theory Based on Two Intelligent Design Entities
    ... > that you were saying that E-Matrix is an intelligent designer. ... Jim Goetz ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Expanding Space
    ... Or are you saying that they are a bunch of idiots and only you have the ... That's not a problem if space is stuff (or the E-Matrix). ... So the new interpretation of SR is that space is not empty as Einstein ... Then space must be the some form of aether like the E-Matrix. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Expanding Space
    ... Or are you saying that they are a bunch of idiots and only you have the ... That's not a problem if space is stuff (or the E-Matrix). ... So the new interpretation of SR is that space is not empty as Einstein ... Then space must be the some form of aether like the E-Matrix. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Expanding Space
    ... Or are you saying that they are a bunch of idiots and only you have the ... That's not a problem if space is stuff (or the E-Matrix). ... So the new interpretation of SR is that space is not empty as Einstein ... Then space must be the some form of aether like the E-Matrix. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: A Scientific Theory Based on Two Intelligent Design Entities
    ... > that you were saying that E-Matrix is an intelligent designer. ... They have no consciousness or ...
    (talk.origins)