Re: Re: Commentary: Intelligent Design: Foolish Darwinians

On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 06:06:02 -0500, "Robert J. Kolker"
<nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx> enriched this group when s/he wrote:

>Jason Spaceman wrote:
>>
>> So with the evidence now in, why are the Darwinians steadfastly
>> defending their system? Simple. Because materialistic, naturalistic
>> evolution has never been primarily about science. It has always been
>> about denying the obvious existence of God.
>
>If the existence of God were obvious this NG would not exist. Science is
>not about denying the existence of God. Science is stone silent on the
>question of the existence of God. It has nothing to say about it. Nothing.

However, it would have something to say about god(s) if there was a
need for such a being to exist in order to explain the universe or
some aspect thereof.
>
>The question of God's existence is not resolvable by empirical means.

Anything that exists would be the subject of science.

>Which indicates that it is either metaphysical or nonsensical.

I do not believe anything transcends physical matter and/or the laws
of nature - therefor nonsensical is the only answer.
>
>Bob Kolker

--
Bob.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Would you stop for a moment?!
    ... However neither are *necessary* for existence to exist. ... The Xtians drive a stake in and say;heres' God, and the Bible is the explanation: start from there and it all makes sense'. ... An inference drawn from a a particular worldview, but that worldview is not absolute: A worldview that places a stake in the ground, calls it 'PHYSICAL reality', and makes its existence the most basic thing there is. ... Essentially from this point of Christianity and the Semitic religions are actually the foundation of material realism ans Western science. ...
    (comp.lang.php)
  • Re: funny creationsist
    ... >>> No. Does not the existence of our free will and conscious mind give ... >> established by science. ... why is this an argument in favour of there being a God? ... > Indirect evidence which helps infer the existence of God? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: funny creationsist
    ... >>> established by science. ... even though you might never be able to show evidence supporting ... to handle many verifiably real aspects of our existence. ... science can't handle God either. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Ludicrous Christian comments. :-)
    ... I'd be very surprised if you could find many scientists who believe ... they can prove or disprove such a thing as the existence of God. ... That's pretty funny considering that science has a tendecy to do the same ...
    (rec.music.makers.percussion)
  • Re: More Crap from you Darwinians
    ... need God to create this universe out of nothing. ... Science knows of nothing that has been ... implies the existence of a lifeform which has moral authority over ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading