Re: Darwin's Dangerous Idea-No Middle Ground



On Thu, 05 Jan 2006 08:28:46 +1000, John Wilkins <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

> Dennett is not regarded as a biologist, although he's a wicked philosopher of
> mind and knows a fair bit about current neurophysiology, he's a philosopher of
> biology in this respect. He's widely regarded even when people think he's
> wrong, because he attacks the right issues.
>
> Incidentally, all the topics being discussed here are phislosophical ones.

Agreed. You need to keep reminding people that Dennet is a philosopher and
not a scientist. Some people mistakenly believe that he has made positive
contributions to science. (There's no doubt that he has made *negative*
contributions to science by helping to promote confusion between science and
philosophy.)

When it comes to science, Dennett is Dawkins' lapdog. I suspect that laps and
dogs are reveresed in the field of philosophy.




Larry Moran


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Question: Philosophy of Science - is it Relevant?
    ... I have heard Michael Ruse speak, have read some of his papers and knew he ... teach Creation "Science" as science was struck down due to his testimony. ... While Robert introduced me as a philosopher of science, ... "ALL mutation is random according to evolution theory" {"Oh, ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: The Origins of a Science
    ... That said, I have been wondering about origins of a science, the seed ... that germinates and from which evolved a new discipline. ... for this topic came from Colin McGinn's The Making of a Philosopher. ... process of formalizing and abstracting those internal models is ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Mystery and Evidence (from The Stone column at the NYT)
    ... >philosopher of science is given a few column inches to comment on their ... >He contrasts folk religion with science as ... But economists have been disastrously wrong, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal
    ... >>alternative theory that could explain the basic features of the observed ... > It is the essence of science. ... The light had not disengaged and the Universe was dark. ... > `philosopher' might say this destroys the credibility of these ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Energy of Gravity is Nonlocal
    ... >>alternative theory that could explain the basic features of the observed ... > It is the essence of science. ... The light had not disengaged and the Universe was dark. ... > `philosopher' might say this destroys the credibility of these ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)