Re: The Heresy of Scientists




On 12/30/05 12:13 PM, in article
1135962786.364234.270700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "cafeinst@xxxxxxx"
<cafeinst@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Oh really? I haven't a clue how science works? See the first item
> googled when typing in "scientific method":
> http://teacher.nsrl.rochester.edu/phy_labs/AppendixE/AppendixE.html
>
> "The scientific method has four steps
> 1. Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena.
>
> 2. Formulation of an hypothesis to explain the phenomena. In physics,
> the hypothesis often takes the form of a causal mechanism or a
> mathematical relation.
>
> 3. Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena,
> or to predict quantitatively the results of new observations.
>
> 4. Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by several
> independent experimenters and properly performed experiments."
>
> It looks to me like the evolutionists are dodging step 4.
>
> Craig

It doesn't matter how it looks to you. You still don't know -- and
apparently haven't bothered to find out.

And yes, you don't know how science works. You haven't a clue. The fact that
you can google and cut and paste doesn't say a thing about your
understanding.

What said mountains about your ignorance was in your original rant.

I don't know how old you are, but you have a lot to learn. The more you
learn, the more ashamed you will be you ever posted such drivel.

Now, if you want to talk, ask questions, and learn something, we will be
happy to oblige. But for you to bust in with your "ignorance is knowledge"
Orwellianism thinking you can take down the Theory of Evolution with your
pitiful rant shows your thinking skills to be extraordinarily deficient.

Where have you learned morals and ethics? Do you usually go around lying
about others based upon your own prejudice?

I wish for you a year of intense learning.

Regards,

Raymond E. Griffith

>
>
> hbarwood@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Your opening statement:
>>
>> "Science is a unique in that a scientist only accepts a claim to be
>> true
>> if it is possible to witness that claim in an experiment or
>> observation"
>>
>> Shows that you haven't a clue how science works.
>>
>> HB
>

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Heresy of Scientists
    ... I haven't a clue how science works? ... "The scientific method has four steps ... Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena. ... independent experimenters and properly performed experiments." ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Re: The Heresy of Scientists
    ... >"The scientific method has four steps ... Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena. ... >independent experimenters and properly performed experiments." ... you don't know how science works. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Heresy of Scientists
    ... I haven't a clue how science works? ... >>"The scientific method has four steps ... Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena. ... >>independent experimenters and properly performed experiments." ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Heresy of Scientists
    ... Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena. ... Many branches of science, most notably astronomy, rely on observation ... Many scientists ... >> Shows that you haven't a clue how science works. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Heresy of Scientists
    ... I haven't a clue how science works? ... Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena. ... Many scientists ... >>> Shows that you haven't a clue how science works. ...
    (talk.origins)