Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: "topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Dec 2005 19:24:45 -0800
Deadrat wrote:
> "topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1135458809.899352.243970@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> >
> > > Actually evidence is what you need. That would be testable. even
> > > reproducible. No we cannot detect other universes.
> >
> > Cannot? I don't think researchers agree that they are inharently
> > undetectable. Some even speculate that other universes can potentially
> > crash into ours.
> >
> > > I know why but it is
> > > not germain to this conversation.
> >
> > I am checking your "falsifiable" criteria against other things
> > considered
> > "science". That is one way to test definitions: see if they still apply
> > to things that they have in the past.
> >
> > > All science, astronomy, physics,
> > > quantum mechanics, or chemistry that I have ever been exposed to is
> > > falsifiable.
> >
> > Evolution is perhaps not even falsifiable. You cannot prove that it
> > never happened anywhere at any time. If you use the "jillion cameras"
> > approach, then that too can falsify ID.
>
> It would help if you learned some science and then some biology.
YOU appear to be the ignorant ones.
> To "falsify" evolution doesn't require "proving" that it never happened.
> You merely have to provide evidence that it can't explain.
No, that would only mean it did not likely happen in *that* spot or
critter being analized. Same thing. You fixed nothing.
> You have
> been provided with examples.
And they all fell apart if I remember correctly. The assertion that
genetics would fit a tree shape fell apart when it was admitted that
cross-species DNA contamination is possible, making a more random
network pattern.
Bzzzzzzt! Try again.
-T-
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: Matt Silberstein
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: Deadrat
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: Mark VandeWettering
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- References:
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: topmind
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: Jon Fleming
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: topmind
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: Deadrat
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: topmind
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: Matt Silberstein
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: topmind
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: Deadrat
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: topmind
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: Deadrat
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: topmind
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: josephus
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: topmind
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: josephus
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: topmind
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: Deadrat
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- Prev by Date: Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- Next by Date: Re: The hamburger
- Previous by thread: Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- Next by thread: Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|