Re: The hamburger
- From: "Deadrat" <ephemera1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 05:18:16 GMT
"Harrison" <NewRevolutions@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1135396027.150218.298390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Evolution has points that are very convincing... but I still dont go
> for it much.
>
> Even so, I dont want to seem biased. Wetboy's explanation was good, but
> to make it fair, we should make a more precise model of evolution.
>
<nonsense snipped>
> Evolution rests on the fact that given infinite time and subtle change,
> anything can be possible.
Cite?
> The weakness is, that the human body is far
> too complex to just have been created in a few billion years.
So you can't believe it, so it must be wrong?
>
> Thats what makes evolution not convincing.
To you. But you're an ignoramus.
>
> Thats what makes intelligent design more appealing.
>
Fine. Worship away. Who's stopping you?
Deadrat
.
- References:
- Re: The hamburger
- From: Brett Aubrey
- Re: The hamburger
- From: Harrison
- Re: The hamburger
- Prev by Date: Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- Next by Date: Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- Previous by thread: Re: The hamburger
- Next by thread: Re: The hamburger
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading