Re: Judge Jones: No Surpise
- From: "DJT" <mousedecat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Dec 2005 12:54:19 -0800
Ray Martinez wrote:
> Dana Tweedy wrote:
> > "Ray Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1135308323.715078.111910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > snipping
> >
> > >> The point is that you aren't answering the question. Do devout
> > >> Christians
> > >> lie under oath? Yes or no?
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Aaron Clausen
> > >> mightymartianca@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > The answer is no of course.
> > >
> > > Can you show the debate where this might have actually happened and not
> > > by innuendo ?
> >
> > Two words: Bonsall , Buckingham
> >
> > And one extra word thown in:
> >
> > Dover
> >
>
> I still have no idea what you are talking about.
Do you mean you dont' know any of the particulars of the trial you are
presuming to criticize?
>
> Could you tell me who these people are and what they supposedly did ?
They were members of the Dover School Board, and they perjured
themselves in open court.
>
> Why the hush hush ?
What "hush hush"? This is all public record.
>
> Could it be the accusation is only a innuendo ?
No, it's because they lied in open court.
>
> Yes, this explains why no Darwinist has yet to actually post an
> argument.
>
> Tell me is it immoral to gossip about persons or is this alright for
> Darwinists ?
You mean how you gossiped about me, and others?
>
> Do you know the ORIGIN of the word "gossip" ?
>
> goSSSSSSip = ***pSSt*** = SSSerpent = Satan [source: Dr. Gene Scott
> Ph.D Stanford University, oral teaching 2002]
Old Gene had a habit of making up folk etymologies for words, whether
because of ignorance, or to make a point. The term "gossip" doesnt'
come from "Satan". Gene is shown wrong yet again.
> DJT
.
- References:
- Judge Jones: No Surpise
- From: Ray Martinez
- Re: Judge Jones: No Surpise
- From: Dana Tweedy
- Re: Judge Jones: No Surpise
- From: Ray Martinez
- Re: Judge Jones: No Surpise
- From: Ray Martinez
- Re: Judge Jones: No Surpise
- From: AC
- Re: Judge Jones: No Surpise
- From: Ray Martinez
- Re: Judge Jones: No Surpise
- From: Dana Tweedy
- Re: Judge Jones: No Surpise
- From: Ray Martinez
- Judge Jones: No Surpise
- Prev by Date: Re: Judge Jones: No Surpise
- Next by Date: Re: Part 1 (of 3): What are major aspects of evolutionary theory?
- Previous by thread: Re: Judge Jones: No Surpise
- Next by thread: Re: Judge Jones: No Surpise
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|