Re: Evolution Deniers

Grendel wrote:
> Beagle wrote:
>
>>Sorry if this has been raised before, but wouldn't it be better to
>>formally categorise IDers and Creationists in their many, somewhat
>>confusing forms as Evolution Deniers? And, yes, I know it echoes
>>Holocaust Deniers, because I think their intellectual honesty is on
>>roughly the same level, not to mention the ideological nastiness that
>>lies (very thinly masked) behind their antics.
>
>
> Evolution deniers (ED) are better EDucated and tend to think for themselves.

I don't suppose you'll be presenting supporting data for this claim any
time soon?

> We choose not to believe in evolution and accept what real science (puts
> on the moon gives us computers science) says about how life and
> organisms work.

This would be "real science" as presented by the gaggle of kooks,
cranks, charlatans and liars styling themselves "Creation Scientists"?

I don't suppose you'll be presenting any of this "real science" any time
soon? Extra points for claims that haven't been refuted fifty times
over.....

>>Evolution Denial, after all, is what these people are about. It's been
>>demonstrated over and over again, not least in t.o., that they have
>>nothing positive to offer science, and only seek to tear the edifice
>>down with abuse, distortion and downright lies. So a wholly negative
>>term for them seems far more apt than 'creationist' or 'intelligent
>>design advocate'. And why should rational people be required to use the
>>terminology of these enemies of rationality?
>
>
> You, as a believer in evolution (BiE) do so in spite of the science or
> the facts...and choose to believe evolution has occurred.
> Terminology I like to describe you folks is "DUBE's" (DUped By
> Evolution) Personally I think you people have smoked one too many DUBEs,
> that is why you cannot think critically about this absurd belief in ToE.
>
>
>
>>Dave the Grouchy Agnostic - it's probably the time of year
>
>
> Jesus *is* the reason for the season.

And here I thought it was the winter solstice, plus a bit of calendrical
drift and assorted syncretisms. Silly me.

-- Kizhe




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Evolution Deniers
    ... >> Evolution deniers are better EDucated ... >> We choose not to believe in evolution and accept what real science (puts ... >> organisms work. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolution Deniers
    ... >> Evolution deniers are better EDucated ... >> We choose not to believe in evolution and accept what real science (puts ... This NG is called talk.origins, with origins being the operative word. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Try this
    ... But you do hear Creationists saying this. ... evolution were wrong, half the sciences would be also. ...  If evolution fell off the face of the earth tommorow *real science* would ... fortunately thomas jefferson saw your view of religion for the lie ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolution Deniers
    ... >> formally categorise IDers and Creationists in their many, ... >Evolution deniers are better EDucated and tend to think for themselves. ... >We choose not to believe in evolution and accept what real science (puts ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolution Deniers
    ... >> formally categorise IDers and Creationists in their many, ... >> confusing forms as Evolution Deniers? ... > We choose not to believe in evolution and accept what real science (puts ...
    (talk.origins)