Re: Evolution Deniers


<jrsp8s@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FVFnf.37141$tV6.23247@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> <sheldon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1134504052.326012.88750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > CreateThis wrote:
> >> sheldon@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>
> >> > VoiceOfReason wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Grendel wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>Beagle wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>Sorry if this has been raised before, but wouldn't it be better to
> >> >>>>formally categorise IDers and Creationists in their many, somewhat
> >> >>>>confusing forms as Evolution Deniers? And, yes, I know it echoes
> >> >>>>Holocaust Deniers, because I think their intellectual honesty is on
> >> >>>>roughly the same level, not to mention the ideological nastiness
that
> >> >>>>lies (very thinly masked) behind their antics.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Evolution deniers (ED) are better EDucated
> >> >>
> >> >>Then why do they fail to exhibit any evidence of it?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>and tend to think for themselves.
> >> >>
> >> >>Except where religion is concerned, in which case it's all about
> >> >>believing what you're told to believe like a good little boy.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > You seems to criticize those who reject evolution, but you obviously
> >> > know nothing about religion.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>>We choose not to believe in evolution and accept what real science
> >> >>>(puts
> >> >>>on the moon gives us computers science) says about how life and
> >> >>>organisms work.
> >> >>
> >> >>You also blatantly lie about your reasons. Biology is real science -
> >> >>hence modern medicine. Spacecraft and computers are engineering
feats
> >> >>*based* on science (and BTW, they tell us nothing about how life and
> >> >>organisms work).
> >> >>
> >> >>You choose not to believe in evolution because it crosses into your
> >> >>cult beliefs.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Some chose not to believe in it because of the incalcuable
probability
> >> > against it.
> >>
> >> ...like they're told to believe. Or are you trying to say you thought
> >> up this 'incalculability' idea all by yourself?
> >>
> >> A little open minded reading would show you it's a bogus idea. But, of
> >> course, to accept that you'd have to be, well... open minded. So never
> >> mind.
> >>
> >> CT
> >
> > Since you put it THAT way, what are you talking about?
>
> If you have a probablility argument, it is likely that it has already been
> falsified. So, your statement about probability shows that you either
have
> not read anything but creationist published arguments, or you have
something
> new on the subject to share. My bet is the former, but please share what
> you have.
>
> JR
> >
> WISTAR DESTROYS EVOLUTION
http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/20hist12.htm


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Evolution Deniers
    ... your statement about probability shows that you either ... >> WISTAR DESTROYS EVOLUTION ... synopsis of these meetings as portrayed on this website? ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Graphing tool
    ... > The tool should have features engineering graphs, probability, youzooming ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.windowsforms)
  • Re: Might you drive us into town?
    ... >or less probability or possibility than may ... Siedo chi? ... Lei o me? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: inventory programs over psion workabout
    ... Yes, as Phil pointed out in another post, this is a commercial program. ... I might contact my ex-boss again for the probability ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.sys.psion.programmer)
  • Math Guys
    ... Suppose your first three cards are 8, 6,4 what is the probability of completing ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)