Re: Evolution Deniers


CreateThis wrote:
> sheldon@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > VoiceOfReason wrote:
> >
> >>Grendel wrote:
> >>
> >>>Beagle wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Sorry if this has been raised before, but wouldn't it be better to
> >>>>formally categorise IDers and Creationists in their many, somewhat
> >>>>confusing forms as Evolution Deniers? And, yes, I know it echoes
> >>>>Holocaust Deniers, because I think their intellectual honesty is on
> >>>>roughly the same level, not to mention the ideological nastiness that
> >>>>lies (very thinly masked) behind their antics.
> >>>
> >>>Evolution deniers (ED) are better EDucated
> >>
> >>Then why do they fail to exhibit any evidence of it?
> >>
> >>
> >>>and tend to think for themselves.
> >>
> >>Except where religion is concerned, in which case it's all about
> >>believing what you're told to believe like a good little boy.
> >>
> >
> >
> > You seems to criticize those who reject evolution, but you obviously
> > know nothing about religion.
> >
> >
> >>>We choose not to believe in evolution and accept what real science (puts
> >>>on the moon gives us computers science) says about how life and
> >>>organisms work.
> >>
> >>You also blatantly lie about your reasons. Biology is real science -
> >>hence modern medicine. Spacecraft and computers are engineering feats
> >>*based* on science (and BTW, they tell us nothing about how life and
> >>organisms work).
> >>
> >>You choose not to believe in evolution because it crosses into your
> >>cult beliefs.
> >
> >
> > Some chose not to believe in it because of the incalcuable probability
> > against it.
>
> ...like they're told to believe. Or are you trying to say you thought
> up this 'incalculability' idea all by yourself?
>
> A little open minded reading would show you it's a bogus idea. But, of
> course, to accept that you'd have to be, well... open minded. So never
> mind.
>
> CT

Since you put it THAT way, what are you talking about?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Things Ive Noticed About Intelligent Design/CreationistProponents
    ... Confrontationism: ID versus Evolution, Creationism vs. the World: ... Evidence challenging evolution ... > Design without conflating the two. ... Equivocating Evolution with Religion ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: OT: Darwins Doubt
    ... He knew that his *ideas* made sense but that the fossil record at the time was too sparse to provide more than circumstantial *evidence*. ... If religion is an evolutionary trait, yet religious beliefs are inherently unprovable, then how can evolutionists be certain that their 'belief' in evolution is any more 'right' than religion? ... In the case of evolution, that's hundreds of thousands of individual hard *facts* that are all compatible with the theory. ... the so-called "god gene" would likely be a by-product of our *evolved* capacity for cultural transmission. ...
    (rec.arts.mystery)
  • Re: OT: Darwins Doubt
    ... If religion is an evolutionary trait, ... The answer is: evidence. ... In the case of evolution, that's hundreds of thousands of individual ... Another aspect of a putative "god gene" might be that we are not so much ...
    (rec.arts.mystery)
  • Re: So what do Catholics believe about Exogenesis?
    ... There are still people that put "God in the gaps" of our ... even without any evidence to support the ... that the stars were a "firmament", that evolution was false, that the ... (what that says about a religion supposedly inspired by God is your ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Any answers to these questions? Religious Literalism???
    ... should dismiss evidence, and perhaps just as seriously that the only ... LITERAL interpretation contradicts science, ... the issue of the harmony of science and religion, ... seem to contradict scientific theories of evolution. ...
    (soc.religion.bahai)