Re: Evolution Deniers

sheldon@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> VoiceOfReason wrote:
>
>>Grendel wrote:
>>
>>>Beagle wrote:
>>>
>>>>Sorry if this has been raised before, but wouldn't it be better to
>>>>formally categorise IDers and Creationists in their many, somewhat
>>>>confusing forms as Evolution Deniers? And, yes, I know it echoes
>>>>Holocaust Deniers, because I think their intellectual honesty is on
>>>>roughly the same level, not to mention the ideological nastiness that
>>>>lies (very thinly masked) behind their antics.
>>>
>>>Evolution deniers (ED) are better EDucated
>>
>>Then why do they fail to exhibit any evidence of it?
>>
>>
>>>and tend to think for themselves.
>>
>>Except where religion is concerned, in which case it's all about
>>believing what you're told to believe like a good little boy.
>>
>
>
> You seems to criticize those who reject evolution, but you obviously
> know nothing about religion.
>
>
>>>We choose not to believe in evolution and accept what real science (puts
>>>on the moon gives us computers science) says about how life and
>>>organisms work.
>>
>>You also blatantly lie about your reasons. Biology is real science -
>>hence modern medicine. Spacecraft and computers are engineering feats
>>*based* on science (and BTW, they tell us nothing about how life and
>>organisms work).
>>
>>You choose not to believe in evolution because it crosses into your
>>cult beliefs.
>
>
> Some chose not to believe in it because of the incalcuable probability
> against it.

....like they're told to believe. Or are you trying to say you thought
up this 'incalculability' idea all by yourself?

A little open minded reading would show you it's a bogus idea. But, of
course, to accept that you'd have to be, well... open minded. So never
mind.

CT

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: bio-evolution lacks both a dynamic and an object
    ... disagreement as to the OBJECT of selection. ... evolution has been shaped by selective pressures acting at these different ... You come across as an engineer who knows physics but not really much at all about biology. ... In real science even "superb" ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolution Deniers
    ... >> Evolution deniers are better EDucated ... >> We choose not to believe in evolution and accept what real science (puts ... >> organisms work. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Dolan misreads adman and argues that there is only one class of theory (those which explain caus
    ... should not be taught with real science either. ... Both ID and Evolution are theories and should not ... Testability is also ... "Evidence confirming an observation is ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Evolution Deniers
    ... >>formally categorise IDers and Creationists in their many, ... > Evolution deniers are better EDucated and tend to think for themselves. ... This would be "real science" as presented by the gaggle of kooks, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: POTM nomination Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
    ... associating it with real science. ... the theory will then bask in the glory of real science. ... http://genome.ucsc.edu/ Use this link and learn about genomes. ... the DNA sequences that evolution has ...
    (talk.origins)