Re: Evolution Deniers
- From: "VoiceOfReason" <papa_fox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Dec 2005 10:03:19 -0800
Grendel wrote:
> Beagle wrote:
> > Sorry if this has been raised before, but wouldn't it be better to
> > formally categorise IDers and Creationists in their many, somewhat
> > confusing forms as Evolution Deniers? And, yes, I know it echoes
> > Holocaust Deniers, because I think their intellectual honesty is on
> > roughly the same level, not to mention the ideological nastiness that
> > lies (very thinly masked) behind their antics.
>
> Evolution deniers (ED) are better EDucated
Then why do they fail to exhibit any evidence of it?
> and tend to think for themselves.
Except where religion is concerned, in which case it's all about
believing what you're told to believe like a good little boy.
> We choose not to believe in evolution and accept what real science (puts
> on the moon gives us computers science) says about how life and
> organisms work.
You also blatantly lie about your reasons. Biology is real science -
hence modern medicine. Spacecraft and computers are engineering feats
*based* on science (and BTW, they tell us nothing about how life and
organisms work).
You choose not to believe in evolution because it crosses into your
cult beliefs.
<...>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evolution Deniers
- From: al
- Re: Evolution Deniers
- From: al
- Re: Evolution Deniers
- From: sheldon@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Evolution Deniers
- References:
- Evolution Deniers
- From: Beagle
- Re: Evolution Deniers
- From: Grendel
- Evolution Deniers
- Prev by Date: Re: AiG: Ignorance or deliberate deception?
- Next by Date: Re: Evolution Deniers
- Previous by thread: Re: Evolution Deniers
- Next by thread: Re: Evolution Deniers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|