Re: Evolution Deniers

Beagle wrote:
> Sorry if this has been raised before, but wouldn't it be better to
> formally categorise IDers and Creationists in their many, somewhat
> confusing forms as Evolution Deniers? And, yes, I know it echoes
> Holocaust Deniers, because I think their intellectual honesty is on
> roughly the same level, not to mention the ideological nastiness that
> lies (very thinly masked) behind their antics.

Evolution deniers (ED) are better EDucated and tend to think for themselves.
We choose not to believe in evolution and accept what real science (puts
on the moon gives us computers science) says about how life and
organisms work.


>
> Evolution Denial, after all, is what these people are about. It's been
> demonstrated over and over again, not least in t.o., that they have
> nothing positive to offer science, and only seek to tear the edifice
> down with abuse, distortion and downright lies. So a wholly negative
> term for them seems far more apt than 'creationist' or 'intelligent
> design advocate'. And why should rational people be required to use the
> terminology of these enemies of rationality?

You, as a believer in evolution (BiE) do so in spite of the science or
the facts...and choose to believe evolution has occurred.
Terminology I like to describe you folks is "DUBE's" (DUped By
Evolution) Personally I think you people have smoked one too many DUBEs,
that is why you cannot think critically about this absurd belief in ToE.


>
> Dave the Grouchy Agnostic - it's probably the time of year

Jesus *is* the reason for the season.
>

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Poor Darwin
    ... The Young Earth Creationists believe ... you misunderstand and misrepresent how science works. ... evolution itself is unscientific. ... > Judgments a surprise to scientists. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: FYI
    ... uttered the example of a giraffe's neck in conjunction with the ToE. ... (Kinda like science.) ... The folks who are upset are the Creationists who backed this fiasco. ... evolution, even when it is pointed to reapeatedly. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Poor Darwin
    ... Perhaps you could tell us why a nonuniform rate of evolution ... >> Creationists of both stripes operate in recognizable ways familiar to ... you misunderstand and misrepresent how science works. ... >> Judgments a surprise to scientists. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Commentary: Behe: Thank God for tenure
    ... >>>dies a hard death, especially in science. ... >> evolution. ... Darwin's ideas are questioned all the time, which is where creationists ... how many species could fit on the ark, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: i want to join with this group
    ... Steven did not suggest that only Creationists are capable of error. ... it's the definition of science by those who actually practice science. ... Science presupposing that God produced reality and the assertion is ... In any case, for evolution to operate, there isn't any need to know the ...
    (talk.origins)