Re: Seeking Publisher For "Mechanism"
- From: "al" <almond@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:38:10 -0000
<unrestrained_hand@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1133898819.934468.316930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> DarelRex@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Your book has serious, even fatal, flaws: the chief of which is its
> > > pedantic pontificating upon social motivation, much of which is not
> > > only known to be incorrect but directly observed to be incorrect. Your
> > > book dismisses this problem by insisting the readers in particular,
and
> > > society in general, merely do not wish to know "the truth."
> > >
> > > Do you really fail to see how insulting such a stance is to your
> > > readers?
> >
> > I do realize that many of the views advanced in my book will be
> > insulting or angering to many. But what is the alternative -- don't
> > advance them? Maybe we should all stop writing about anything?
> >
> > Take a hard look at your above message and ask if it is any more or
> > less insulting that what anyone else on this newsgroup has to say.
>
> Perhaps you should ask *yourself this - if he is correct, or merely
> believes he is correct, then how could he have possibly presented this
> observation in a less annoying way? Maybe you are bothered by the
> message more than the delivery. If so, then imagine how you would
> receive a book that insists you are deceiving yourself on important and
> observable issues, and motivated by fear or similar unadmirable
> emotion.
>
> >
> > Darel
> Where do I get this book?
>
.
- References:
- Re: Seeking Publisher For "Mechanism"
- From: unrestrained_hand
- Re: Seeking Publisher For "Mechanism"
- Prev by Date: SV: New Evolution/ID debate thread
- Next by Date: Re: Philosophical Difference
- Previous by thread: Re: Seeking Publisher For "Mechanism"
- Next by thread: Re: Seeking Publisher For "Mechanism"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
