Re: Seeking Publisher For "Mechanism"
- From: unrestrained_hand@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 6 Dec 2005 12:01:24 -0800
DarelRex@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Your book has serious, even fatal, flaws: the chief of which is its
> > pedantic pontificating upon social motivation, much of which is not
> > only known to be incorrect but directly observed to be incorrect. Your
> > book dismisses this problem by insisting the readers in particular, and
> > society in general, merely do not wish to know "the truth."
> >
> > Do you really fail to see how insulting such a stance is to your
> > readers?
>
> I do realize that many of the views advanced in my book will be
> insulting or angering to many. But what is the alternative -- don't
> advance them? Maybe we should all stop writing about anything?
>
> Take a hard look at your above message and ask if it is any more or
> less insulting that what anyone else on this newsgroup has to say.
Perhaps you should ask *yourself this - if he is correct, or merely
believes he is correct, then how could he have possibly presented this
observation in a less annoying way? Maybe you are bothered by the
message more than the delivery. If so, then imagine how you would
receive a book that insists you are deceiving yourself on important and
observable issues, and motivated by fear or similar unadmirable
emotion.
>
> Darel
> http://alienryderflex.com/mechanism
Kermit
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Philosophical Difference
- Next by Date: Re: IN THE NEWS: Creationists fight back the good Christian way
- Previous by thread: Re: Seeking Publisher For "Mechanism"
- Next by thread: Bigfoot DVD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
