Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: "topmind" <topmind@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Dec 2005 21:05:49 -0800
> Been there done that. You are not using the same
> definition of ID that
> I am. Next...
After thinking about it I realized that this was not very friendly of
me. I accidentally carried over my reply mode from the heated debates
on alt.atheism without warrant. Nobody chewed me out here (yet).
I apologize. -T-
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: Navillus
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- References:
- Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: topmind
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: Ken Shaw
- Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- From: topmind
- Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- Prev by Date: Re: Wow, there are terrestrial crustaceans!
- Next by Date: Re: Is evolution an example of decreasing entropy?
- Previous by thread: Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- Next by thread: Re: Book-able view of ID as speculative science
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading