Re: Evidence

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:24:33 -0700, "Richard Dawkins"
<Dawkins@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
><rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

>>
>> Macroevolution is demonstrated by the correspondences of genes amongst
>> living things today, including us - the family relationships. It's
>> evident that living things are all connected.
>
>Yes within their own kind and species.
>This is good science.

whatever a 'kind' is. and since speciation has been observed his
comment about evolution being within species is

wrong.

>
>There is no evidence for the large number of transitional forms to needed
>bridge the method of this process and that is critical to prove the theory
>of abiogenesis.

yes there is.

see how easy that is!

>Thi is needed specially during the early stage of the process.
>The plausibility of abiogenesis has changed tremndously in recent years due
>to research in molecular biology that has displayed exactly how complex life
>is in itself, and how much evidence exists going against the probability of
>spontaneous generation.

abiogenesis is irrelevant to evolution. we dont know how life got
started so how can he say it's 'impossible'?

oh. he just does.


>>
>Ahhh knew it would come sooner or later,you know that spiral spiraling down
>thing you evolutionsts do when you cannot refute the facts using sound and
>logical science.

funny that only american religious cultists think THEY know science.
if you believe them the world's leading scientific research center is
the southern baptist theological seminary, and MIT, harvard and
stanford are trade schools.

---------------------------
to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
and enter 'wf3h' in the field

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Whats the Problem?
    ... It is true that science has shown that variation of the basic forces ... because the proponents of abiogenesis and theory of evolution say ... Can anyone identify the process by which the precursors to the DNA ... Evolution is a gradual process; ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The Dover Decision
    ... for rejecting ID as science: ... ID's negative attacks on evolution have been refuted by the ... > If God is supernatural then so is abiogenesis. ... Scientists are hard ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Abiogenesis V IDology
    ... Abiogenesis is sort of a grey area of science. ... evolution at the present) or evolution, it will have to be testable in ... as a kind of overarching origination idea. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Abiogenesis
    ... Science cannot explain how it occurred. ... mystery of abiogenesis, how would stating that science has solved it ... that would confirm the existence of life. ... say on the subject (and so much to say on the subject of evolution ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Abiogenesis V IDology
    ... Therefore abiogenesis must be unscientific and it follows ... >> there was a time it was not living and a later time that some matter ... Evolution happens. ...
    (talk.origins)