Re: Mischaracterization of ID?
- From: TomS <TomS_member@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Nov 2005 03:56:09 -0800
"On 25 Nov 2005 03:37:03 -0800, in article
<1132918623.028284.244450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
stated..."
>
>
>Andrew wrote:
>> We scored one minor victory in Dover; hopefully
>> we'll score another few.
>
>If you're referring to the trial, there's no verdict yet, is there? If
>you're referring to the election, they'll be running again next time.
>Eternal vigilance.
>
>And yes, certainly there will be more Dovers.
>
And we can be confident that, however favorably the trials and
the various elections go, there will still be plenty of K-12 science
teachers who will be afraid to talk about evolution.
--
---Tom S. <http://talkreason.org/articles/chickegg.cfm>
"It is not too much to say that every indication of Design in the Kosmos is so
much evidence against the Omnipotence of the Designer. ... The evidences ... of
Natural Theology distinctly imply that the author of the Kosmos worked under
limitations..." John Stuart Mill, "Theism", Part II
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mischaracterization of ID?
- From: Rodjk #613
- Re: Mischaracterization of ID?
- References:
- Mischaracterization of ID?
- From: Cleombrotus
- Re: Mischaracterization of ID?
- From: Andrew
- Re: Mischaracterization of ID?
- From: rja.carnegie@xxxxxxxxxx
- Mischaracterization of ID?
- Prev by Date: Dangers of creationism
- Next by Date: Re: What is complexity?
- Previous by thread: Re: Mischaracterization of ID?
- Next by thread: Re: Mischaracterization of ID?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|