Re: Yet another ID lie - Humans do evolve.


"NashtOn" <nana@xxxxx> wrote in message
news:xqigf.127157$Ph4.3901375@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> eroot@xxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Grandbank wrote:
>>
>>>NashtOn wrote:
>>>
>>>>Grandbank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>No, actually that is a basic uninformed lie.
>>>>>Teeth are not at all like bone in either their anatomy or histology.
>>>>>Teeth possess none of the 4 tissues you list above.
>>>>
>>>>I guess there is no hydroxyapatite in teeth, huh?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Of course there is. Teeth share many components with the rest of the
>>>body. Teeth have some compounds in them that are also in livers,
>>>brains, and sphincters. They do not, however, behave in the same
>>>manner as those other body parts.
>>
>>
>> You will note, though, that NashTon's brain functions just like a
>> sphincter.
>
> Well, you seem to be an expert in sphincters.
>
>>
Tick tock, tick tock...
>>
>>>>>While I admire your chutzpah, tossing a Hail Mary like that and hoping
>>>>>there wouldn't be a dentist (or anyone with some knowledge of the
>>>>>subject) in the crowd to intercept it, well, you lose.
>>>>
>>>>Are you saying that teeth don't respond to external stimuli?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Not at all like bone, no. Bone is vascular and responds far
>>>differently to stimulus. Bone, for example, becomes more dense when
>>>physically stressed. Tooth structure just wears or breaks. When
>>>broken, bone heals - teeth do not. (Thank God)
>>>
>>>>>That "This is basic physiology" bluff line did have a nice ring to it
>>>>>though, didn't it. Very authoritative. Very wrong. Do you play
>>>>>poker?
>>>>
>>>>Actually, it would be very nice of you to give us a lesson on tooth
>>>>physiology, from embryology to the mature tooth. Actually, a few
>>>>references will do.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Any 101 level textbook pretty much lays it out. Since you are the one
>>>making the extraordinary claim that teeth have the same physiology as
>>>bone and respond to stimuli the same as bone, wouldn't it sort of be
>>>*your* job to provide the evidence? Or didn't you realize that your
>>>statement was pretty much on the level of "people have 3 ears" - so
>>>far out of touch with reality that the reast of the world doesn't
>>>exactly feel the need to go gathering evidence for you? Do your own
>>>fruitless googling.
>>>
>>>>>Your ignorance of dental anatomy and histology would appear to match
>>>>>your ignorance of darn near everything you post about.
>>>>
>>>>Yawn. You and your ilk would say anything to discredit your opponents.
>>>>These antic don't cut it here, you merely succeed in making yourself
>>>>look like a blithering fool, fool.
>>
>>
>> Creationist antics don't cut it here, which is why they universally
>> look like, smell like, and quack like blithering fools.
>
> Yawn.

I will take a wild guess, and assert that you will not be providing the
evidence that has been asked for.

JR
>
> Nicolas
>
>>
>>
>>>All you need do is scamper to any of the hundreds of internet sites
>>>that describe dental anatomy, give us the link to the descriptions of
>>>osteoblasts, osteoclasts, Haversian canals, and Volkman's canals and
>>>we'll all go there for a look.
>>>
>>>
>>>Tick, tick. tick....
>>>
>>>
>>>Evidence talks, bull*** walks....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>KP
>>
>>
>

.