Re: Why Harshman Cannot Prove Macroevolution
- From: Jack Dominey <look@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 00:21:29 -0500
In <1131078535.899982.267860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Ray
Martinez" <pyramidial@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Jack Dominey wrote:
<snip>
>> Well, there's your problem. Ray is a disciple of the departed Dr.
>> Scott, IMO one of the greatest con-men of the late 20th century.
<snip>
>Very predictable atheist rant.
That wasn't a rant, Ray. A rant is like what Gene used to do when
he'd attack the FCC back in the day, or maybe one of his frequent
complaints about the incompetence of his staff. Or perhaps when he'd
go on at great length about how ingrateful the congregation was when
they didn't pony up whatever amount of donations he was demanding at
the time.
>Your approval would have demonstrated our wrongness.
Nah, 'your' wrongness was demonstrated by the fact that the
congregation gave so much time, money, and respect to a ruthless,
greedy, self-centered b*st*rd who wouldn't have poured out half his
glass of tap water for a King's House that was on fire. (Hint: That
could be the start of a rant, if I were to extend it a while.)
--
"I'm gonna act grown up/That's my plan"
Jack Dominey
jack_dominey (at) email (dot) com
R.I.P. Bob Denver
.
- References:
- Why Harshman Cannot Prove Macroevolution
- From: Ray Martinez
- Re: Why Harshman Cannot Prove Macroevolution
- From: John Harshman
- Re: Why Harshman Cannot Prove Macroevolution
- From: Dana Tweedy
- Re: Why Harshman Cannot Prove Macroevolution
- From: Ray Martinez
- Why Harshman Cannot Prove Macroevolution
- Prev by Date: Re: Just turn the channel
- Next by Date: Re: Here is the way that evilutionists explain the world.
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Harshman Cannot Prove Macroevolution
- Next by thread: Re: Why Harshman Cannot Prove Macroevolution
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading