Re: Problems in getting answers?



On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 18:06:46 GMT, B Richardson
<brich@xxxxxxxxxxxx> spake thusly:

>On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:41:11 GMT, Pastor Dave <1news-group-mail1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 3 Nov 2005 16:20:26 -0800, "Friar Broccoli"
>><EliasRK@xxxxxxxxx> spake thusly:
>>
>>>Pastor Dave wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then they'll claim that they need to know what *I* would
>>>> accept as evidence, as if they had actually presented some and
>>>> I had rejected it. They will never admit that the simple fact
>>>> is that they have presented NO EVIDENCE.
>>>
>>> Well how about you admitting that ALL the EVIDENCE is against
>>> six day creation and an earth that is less than 10,000 years
>>> old. Specifically, can you answer even one of my 3 standard
>>> questions for creationists:
>>>
>>>
>>> 1) The closest galaxy to us is Andromeda, which is
>>> 3,000,000 light years away. How did the light from
>>> Andromeda get here in less than 10,000 years?
>>>
>>> 2) Trilobites are extinct animals that lived at the bottom
>>> of the ocean (underwater). Their fossil remains are
>>> often found on dry land, in the middle of continents, in
>>> solid rock, hundreds of feet below ground. How did
>>> Trilobite fossils get into those rocks on land in less
>>> than 10,000 years, and why are there no fossils from
>>> crabs and lobsters (which are not extinct) with them?
>>>
>>> 3) Sometimes in coal mines more than 1 kilometer
>>> underground, fossilized tree stumps fall from the top of
>>> a mine shaft killing the workers below. How did the
>>> fossilized stumps of extinct trees get buried more than
>>> a kilometer underground in less than 10,000 years?
>>
>> Note folks, they claim evidence for evolution and instead,
>> try to attack intelligent design. They think that questions
>> are answers.
>>
>> How do we get trees running upside down through multiple
>> layers that are supposed to be millions of years apart, with
>> greenery still on them? <chuckle>
>>
>
>Is this what you are talking about? (see post #21 by Birkeland)
>
>http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=msg&f=7&t=116&m=16

Where is this "mountain of evidence" that evolutionists
claim to have? That is what I'm talking about. Your
attempt to duck that then pretend that I'm running away,
won't work.

--

Pastor Dave Raymond
1st Century Church of Christ

What shall I render to the Lord
for all His benefits toward me?
I will take up the cup of salvation
and call upon the name of the Lord.
- Psalm 116:12-13

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Making money from Java
    ... >> rather than to a Biblical flood exposing people to radiation. ... > covered and protected the earth, and that this covering was destroyed at the ... >> geological processes are insufficient to have swept that evidence away. ... >>> Fossils don't form under normal circumstances. ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Tweedys Turkana Boy
    ... I thought you were a Gestaltist who knew everything about evolution. ... Dana NEVER posted an argument about Turkana. ... claim or argument EXCEPT to say that it represented evidence of human ... Neither of those assumptions are required to see that many fossils ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Answering Friar Broccoli
    ... Why, if you think this way, are you forced to reject evolution? ... care for simple statements with no evidence to back it up. ... small-brained as ancestral to modern humans. ... fossils rather than the relatively few I have seen. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: The most serious defect in the evolutionary theory is the absence of transitional fossils.
    ... > Bobby Bryant intentionally acts like the total lack of transitionals is ... However there is not a lack of transitional fossils. ... Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. ... > everything about Darwinists you need to know: ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: David Attenborough reporting chimp wading (and supporting a waterside model for human evolution)
    ... waist-deep, in the gallery forest, and then with no handy ... The "no handy trees" argument was a speific ... dreaded waist deep water. ... The evidence is there for all to see. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)