Re: A Few Simple Questions for a Simple Mind
- From: "Richard Forrest" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Oct 2005 00:14:44 -0800
Seanpit wrote:
> Richard Forrest wrote:
>
> > No you haven't. You have made
> > assertions based on your rather poor
> > knowledge of the biological
> > processes involved which have been
> > eviscerated by those with such knowledge.
<snipped>
> I just don't get it . . . and it isn't all that helpful for you to tell
> me that my not getting the truth of your position is due to ignorance
> or insanity. Perhaps if you could make your position a bit more easily
> understood by answering a few simple questions for a simple mind?
>
I've given you a detailed analysis of one of your web pages which cover
an area in which I have detailed knowledge. I've given you the
references by which you can check that when I identify a statement you
have made on that site as false, you can cross-check my assesment. I
have pointed out the logical inconsistencies, and the false conclusions
you have drawn because you lack knowledge of the subject, and pointed
you at sources of information from which you can learn about the
subject.
Have you made any changes to the page?
Your position stems from the conviction that you are right, regardless
of any evidence to the contrary. As you ignore any evidence to the
contrary, such as I have provided, you maintain your conviction of
being right on the basis of ignorance.
What do you call it?
RF
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Discovery Institute & Dover
- Next by Date: Re: Could Behe be schizophrenic?
- Previous by thread: Re: A Few Simple Questions for a Simple Mind
- Next by thread: Re: A Few Simple Questions for a Simple Mind
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|