Re: Evolution finally proven. IDers take note.



NashtOn wrote:
> Cowboy wrote:
> > On 21-Oct-2005, "Michael Altarriba" <mikealt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>What evidence can you present which suggests evolution *isn't*
> >>responsible for the range of species we observe in the world today, and
> >>in the past via the examination of fossilized remains?
> >
> >
> > Well, the fact that there isn't a smooth, incremental progression is
> > problematic for me. Calling it "punctuated equilibrium" does not provide a
> > convincing argument.
> >
> > I have no problem with evolution being presented as one possible explanation
> > for the current state of life. I do have a problem with it being presented
> > as the only possible or acceptable theory and censoring ID as a possible
> > alternative explanation.
>
> There are no ngs with people disputing quantum mechanics, classical
> physics, genetics or chemistry/biochemistry.
> These are true sciences, with enough clout to deflect any critique
> concerning their theories, postulates or formulas.

These other sciences are fortunate in that they are not being stalked
by maniacs...yet.

>
> Evolutionists, OTOH, are extremely insecure in their "science" and the
> data to support it,

The forces of science are as secure (and insecure) in their science as
anybody else. They just get rightfully concerned when they see the
villagers (woefully vulnerable to the clever lies of fanatics)
sharpening their pitchforks and lighting their torches.

> which is for the most part circumstantial,

What problem do you have with circumstantial? Especially when the ID
side, upon whom the burden of proof is laid, doesn't have any evidence.


> hence the
> ad homs, insults and other childish behavior you will experience as a
> response to what I just wrote;)
>
> Nicola

Eric Root

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
    ... circumstance strengthens some core responses (let's look at ... ethos of this 'science' as his ideology. ... What did Skinner champion as ... terms of his paper "On the Generic Nature of Stimulus and Response." ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
    ... moment) and then the core responses become temporally organized ... ethos of this 'science' as his ideology. ... What did Skinner champion as the most ... paper "On the Generic Nature of Stimulus and Response." ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
    ... circumstance strengthens some core responses (let's look at tacts for ... ethos of this 'science' as his ideology. ... What did Skinner mean when he talked about "the natural lines of fracture"? ... Discuss this in terms of his paper "On the Generic Nature of Stimulus and Response." ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
    ... circumstance strengthens some core responses (let's look at tacts for ... ethos of this 'science' as his ideology. ... What did Skinner mean when he talked about "the natural lines of fracture"? ... Discuss this in terms of his paper "On the Generic Nature of Stimulus and Response." ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)
  • Re: A preliminary look at Spoonerisms
    ... moment) and then the core responses become temporally organized ... ethos of this 'science' as his ideology. ... forces on the observer a kind of bureaucracy of observation. ... paper "On the Generic Nature of Stimulus and Response." ...
    (comp.ai.philosophy)