Re: universality of codons to amino acids
- From: "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Oct 2005 12:36:29 -0700
John Harshman schreef:
> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
> > Kleuskes & Moos wrote:
> >
> >
> >>A ribosome actually consist of a complex of proteins. So it's not just
> >>"stuff".
> >
> >
> > You mean, a complex of proteins isn't stuff? That is a whole new
> > definition of "stuff" that I never knew. Do you have a wikopedia entry
> > that I can look up somewhere that explains how proteins aren't stuff?
>
> No need to get snide. You seemed to be saying that "ribosome" was a
> substance, like nylon or grape jelly, when instead it's an object, like
> a radio or a volvo. It's not a complex of proteins either; it's a
> complex of proteins and RNA, in which the most important component is
> RNA. In fact, a ribosome will function (though not as well) with all of
> its proteins removed.
I learn something new every day.
Thank you.
.
- References:
- universality of codons to amino acids
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: universality of codons to amino acids
- From: Kleuskes & Moos
- Re: universality of codons to amino acids
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: universality of codons to amino acids
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: universality of codons to amino acids
- From: John Harshman
- universality of codons to amino acids
- Prev by Date: Re: anti-biotic resistance theory false?
- Next by Date: Re: You know what I really love
- Previous by thread: Re: universality of codons to amino acids
- Next by thread: Re: universality of codons to amino acids
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|