Re: Commentary: Defending the concept of intelligent design

I can accept a NATURALIST hypothesis of intelligent design as POSSIBLE,
but there is no evidence for such a hypothesis at all.

Yes, it is possible for ID to be secular. Yes, it is possible for ID
to be naturalistic. However, ID right now is tied up with too much in
terms of politics and culture for it to be free of such biases. Most
importantly, ID has little to no evidence behind it such that it could
even be called a worthy scientific hypothesis.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Kansas School Board
    ... > If that isn't evidence of intelligent design I don't know what is. ... There are other "coincidences", though, for example: ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.humor.jewish)
  • Proof of Intelligent Design
    ... You may have seen these already, but why is Ed Conrad silent? ... Surely this is the greatest evidence for Intelligent Design yet. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Horizon - War on Science
    ... It just tries to claim there's evidence for a designer and doesn't say anything about how it all actually happens. ... Intelligent design sounds great until you think about it, ... disturbing is that in America the God Squad Christians want it made law ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)
  • Re: Teachable Theory of ID
    ... >> After looking at Intelligent Design for several months I have come to ... >> see the only problem the evolution believers have with Intelligent ... >cannot be falsified by any evidence. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Kansas School Board
    ... > ostensibly in science class. ... >>> whether the alternative theory of Intelligent Design should be taught ... We have evidence that a Flying Spaghetti Monster ...
    (rec.humor.jewish)