Re: Irrational Naturalism
- From: "VBM" <marilynmc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:24:32 -0700
"NashtOn" <nana@xxxxx> wrote in message
news:lC8%e.98877$Ph4.3109011@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Elf M. Sternberg wrote:
>> "Kant" <Kant@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>
>>>One of the most disturbing attitudes of most evolutionists is their
>>>insistence on naturalism as the premise for explaining everything from
>>>the
>>>origin of the cosmos to the origin of the human soul. The fact is that
>>>total
>>>naturalism is quite devoid of real explanatory power for almost anything.
>>>
>>>http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=2469
>>
>>
>> It never ceases to amaze that people dependent for their very
>> lives upon conclusions drawn from methodological naturalism continue to
>> dis it.
>>
>> Elf
>>
>
>
> Do you think these people can be objective about evolution/naturalism?
Why the "/" ? Why are these tied together at the hip? There are millions
of people who accept evolution that do not accept philosophical naturalism,
and so evolution is not dependent upon naturalism.
.
- References:
- Re: Irrational Naturalism
- From: Elf M. Sternberg
- Re: Irrational Naturalism
- Prev by Date: Re: Dangerous new drug: Gerin Oil [by Richard Dawkins]
- Next by Date: Re: Five major misconceptions for evolution
- Previous by thread: Re: Irrational Naturalism
- Next by thread: Re: Irrational Naturalism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|