Re: In the News: No method to intelligent design, witness says
- From: bdbryant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bobby D. Bryant)
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:48:08 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Jason Spaceman <notreally@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Also see 'Witness bashes intelligent design' at
> http://ydr.com/story/doverbiology/87429/
>
> From the article:
> -------------------------------------
> A philosopher of science said the controversial idea rejects science.
>
> By LAURI LEBO
> Daily Record/Sunday News
> Thursday, September 29, 2005
>
> Intelligent design proponents' ultimate goal is to create a
> revolution in science, taking it back to the days when epilepsy was
> believed to have been caused by divine possession and gravity was
> thought to be the result of "spooky action at a distance," an expert
> testified in the third day of Dover school district's trial over
> biology class.
Am I the only one who finds it odd that he would lump those two
ideas into the same category?
--
Bobby Bryant
Austin, Texas
.
- Prev by Date: Eucharistic Miracles
- Next by Date: Re: Columnist: The worst job: Teaching science in Dover
- Previous by thread: Eucharistic Miracles
- Next by thread: Re: Columnist: The worst job: Teaching science in Dover
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
