Re: Greater than 98% Chimp/human DNA similarity? Not any more.
- From: Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:43:52 +0100
In message <Xns96E09CD5D88812galopagosterrapincy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Cyde Weys
<cyde@xxxxxxx> writes
>John Harshman <jharshman.diespamdie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>news:7FU_e.1205$Y_5.242@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>
>> Yes. There are several known species in which chromosome number is
>> polymorphic within populations.
>
>Really? I've never even heard of such a thing. Can you give references
>please? I must educate myself! Thanks.
>
For example (available online, or at least was),
Wójcik et al, Evolution of the common shrew Sorex araneus: chromosomal
and molecular aspects, Acta Theriologica 47, Suppl. 1: 139-167 (2002)
Otherwise googling for "chromosomal races" should find some stuff.
--
alias Ernest Major
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.6/111 - Release Date: 23/09/2005
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Greater than 98% Chimp/human DNA similarity? Not any more.
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: Greater than 98% Chimp/human DNA similarity? Not any more.
- References:
- Re: Greater than 98% Chimp/human DNA similarity? Not any more.
- From: Matthew Isleb
- Re: Greater than 98% Chimp/human DNA similarity? Not any more.
- From: Cyde Weys
- Re: Greater than 98% Chimp/human DNA similarity? Not any more.
- Prev by Date: Re: Who's who in ID
- Next by Date: Re: Who's who in ID
- Previous by thread: Re: Greater than 98% Chimp/human DNA similarity? Not any more.
- Next by thread: Re: Greater than 98% Chimp/human DNA similarity? Not any more.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|