Re: Proof there exists a soul
- From: unrestrained_hand@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 26 Sep 2005 10:38:19 -0700
Robert J. Kolker wrote:
> unrestrained_hand@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
> >
> >
> > Bob - are you autistic, by any chance? I don't mean this as an
> > insult; Asperger's runs in our family (Asperger's may or may not be a
> > form of autism). Your science is generally correct, and your basic
> > logic sound, but you seem to completely miss wordplay, sarcasm, humor,
> > etc. This post you are responding to was an illustration for the OP of
> > just how lame his assertions are (I guess we could call it an argument;
> > it has the form of one).
> >
> > You also miss the sociological complexities when political threads
> > start, which seems to be related to your personal interactions. This is
> > not the first time you've attacked someone on the side of light and
> > reason; perhaps you just miss the social cues?
>
> Dead right, pard. I am an Asperger person. It is not that I miss social
> cues, it is that I do not wish to know them. I work on a very simple
> principle. I take people at their word and I expect people to take me at
> my word. My approach may be gauche, but it is simple.
>
> Bob Kolker
OK; thanks. I'll try to be clear on any thread I post to when you're
around, but I won't get on your case if you miss it, I'll just point it
out. I do much better with language than I do with body language and
social situations, and much better with the printed word than spoken.
Kermit
.
- References:
- Proof there exists a soul
- From: Logos
- Re: Proof there exists a soul
- From: Bob Pease
- Re: Proof there exists a soul
- From: Robert J. Kolker
- Proof there exists a soul
- Prev by Date: Re: Hobbit Probabilities
- Next by Date: Re: The universe looks designed to me
- Previous by thread: Re: Proof there exists a soul
- Next by thread: Re: Proof there exists a soul
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|