Re: Has science discovered the supernatural?

Bob wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 21:18:32 GMT, Wall of Sleep <Sabotage@xxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>I'm really not that stuck on the "supernatural" moniker. It just struck
>>me that perhaps what has been labeled "supernatural" in the past might
>>now be explained in the light of these extra dimensions and parallel
>>universes.
>
>
> not a single scientist has ever suggested such an interpretation. it
> smacks of desperation.
>
>
>>The terms "natural" and "supernatural" are really irrelevant
>>to me.
>
>
> words have meaning. that's why we use them.
>

Define the terms "natural" and "supernatural" for me then please, so I
can know where my contentions fall within *your* definitions.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The space between universes
    ... > What is the space between universes called? ... Please provide evidence for ... Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Legend of the Rangers
    ... Which Babylon 5 character appears in this DVD, bridging the gap between the ... old and new universes? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.rec.competitions)
  • Re: Space
    ... gravity creates universes. ... TreBert ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics)
  • For the Chem / Physics dork in all of us...
    ... REALLY good set of articles in this months 'Discover' mag. ... interesting stuff about quantum gravity, extra dimensions, etc. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.music.phish)
  • Re: Has science discovered the supernatural?
    ... >>as only dealing with the observable. ... >>universes with differing laws than ours, ... > (atoms, gravity, common descent, extra dimensions) as long as their ... > universes, if they affected *his*universe in some detectable way that had no ...
    (talk.origins)