Re: Is "Flat-Faced Man" Your Ancestor?

On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 11:19:51 -0700, in talk.origins
"Kant" <Kant@xxxxxxxx> wrote in <8TBZe.23$Wm4.682@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>"Bob" <wf3h@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:4336631e.134086624@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 21:16:30 -0700, "Kant" <Kant@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Bob" <wf3h@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>news:4335f6aa.106370533@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:41:08 -0700, "Kant" <Kant@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Bob" <wf3h@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>news:4335bbd5.91380792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:33:11 GMT, NashtOn <nana@xxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Primates that happened to grind their knuckles a little less during
>>>>>>>gait, as witnessed by the form of their pelvis (hardly an adaptation)
>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>a far cry from proving that they eventually evolved into humans.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and yet the fact is they did.
>>>>>
>>>>>Proof outside of theory?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> because we have evidence that evolution is a fact.
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------
>>>> to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
>>>> and enter 'wf3h' in the field
>>>>
>>>
>>>Then why is still labeled a theory?
>>
>> for the same reason atomic 'theory' is a theory while no one doubts
>> the existence of atoms.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------
>> to see who "wf3h" is, go to "qrz.com"
>> and enter 'wf3h' in the field
>
>You haven't answered the question?
>Why is it still a theory of poorly structured guesswork?

You cannot be talking about evolution any more, since that theory is
well supported by the evidence.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: MERRY CHRISTMAS.. its okay to say it!
    ... >No evolution probably will never ... >be falsified simply because it's supported by *all* the evidence found ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: Is "Flat-Faced Man" Your Ancestor?
    ... > because we have evidence that evolution is a fact. ... > and enter 'wf3h' in the field ... Prev by Date: ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Dover Area School Board Absurdity #1
    ... tested as new evidence is discovered. ... Are there any scientists working in the evolutionary sciences who have ... theory is certainly not a fact, evolution is. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Time for your monthly dose of evolution disproof straw poll
    ... > What is the smallest amount of evidence you would have to see to ... > believe that evolution is mostly false, and what would that evidence ... But before we go in to that, are you talking about evolution, the ... Prev by Date: ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Speculative Design Hypothesis (with predictions)
    ... intelligent design has produced these types of functions ... is just evidence that intelligence *can* produce such things. ... there's no proof that evolution did produce it, ... So how is the assertion that specific functions in biological systems ...
    (talk.origins)