Re: The problem is not in the proof....
- From: NashtOn <nana@xxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:01:10 GMT
Bobby D. Bryant wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, email_slot@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
>>We can sit here all day long telling, showing, linking, directing, etc.
>>people to how evolution is proven time and again but it won't do a d@mn
>>bit of difference until they are willing to ACCEPT what has been given.
>> They say they will accept the information when we have given proof
>>that evolution is occurring but look at what has happened so far.
>>Nothing, nada, nunca... only but a handful have actually opened their
>>eyes to what is going on around them.
>>
>>The problem with creationist and their ilk is that they have for
>>forever and a day accepted things without knowledge or, in other words,
>>faith and belief, or a hypothesis that they have claimed to be true
>>outright or a theory.
>>
>>How can you expect to change (hah! yeah, right CHANGE is not in their
>>vocab) someone that relies on an absence of knowledge??? You are
>>giving them knowledge but with faith as their guiding principle, any
>>attempt to educate them is contradictory to their stance since they
>>have accepted their stance without knowledge.
>>
>>Wish I could say more but I feel my point has been made. You don't pay
>>much mind to a bug splattering on a windshield right? So why pay any
>>mind to them?
>
>
> I don't object to people believing creationism or any other mythology,
> so long as they don't expect public policy to take account of their
> beliefs.
That's nice. Unfortunately you have only one vote and in democracies,
the majority rules so keep barking.
As for mythology, look no further than the myth of "evolution."
>
> Alas, here in the USA we've got a lot of people who think government
> is a puppet to be used for enforcing their personal beliefs and
> lifestyles on everyone else.
Oh well, it could be because there is nothing in the form of evidence,
except for some scant fossils here and there, a few monkeys with fancy
Latin appellations that "Anthropologists" try to convince themselves,
first and foremost, that they are intermediate forms of humans.
Americans are a very smart nation; could it be that the dreary myth of
Darwinism doesn't shake their tree?
Nicolas
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The problem is not in the proof....
- From: email_slot
- Re: The problem is not in the proof....
- From: VoiceOfReason
- Re: The problem is not in the proof....
- From: Ferrous Patella
- Re: The problem is not in the proof....
- From: Ferrous Patella
- Re: The problem is not in the proof....
- From: Richard Forrest
- Re: The problem is not in the proof....
- From: Steven J.
- Re: The problem is not in the proof....
- From: Adam H.
- Re: The problem is not in the proof....
- Prev by Date: Re: Has science discovered the supernatural?
- Next by Date: Re: An Essay on Creation
- Previous by thread: Re: The problem is not in the proof....
- Next by thread: Re: The problem is not in the proof....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading