Re: The Answers in Genesis list of arguments Creationists shouldn't use



VBM wrote:
> For those interested, I thought I would repost the list of former YEC
> arguments that Answers in Genesis is now saying should *not* be used to
> support Creationism. As they say "some [of these] arguments are definitely
> fallacious, while others are merely doubtful or unsubstantiated".
>
> We still see some Creationists using them, so I thought it was worthwhile to
> show them that even the most ardent Creationist organization has
> acknowledged these ones are not good arguments.
>
> . Here is the list:
>
> 1. Darwin recanted on his deathbed
>
> 2. Moon-Dust thickness proves a young moon
>
> 3. NASA computers, in calculating the positions of planets, found a missing
> day and 40 minutes, proving Joshua's "long day" and Hezekiah's sundial
> movement of Joshua 10 and 2 Kings 20.
>
> 4. Woolly mammoths were snap frozen during the Flood catastrophe
>
> 5. The Castenedolo and Calaveras human remains in "old" strata invalidate
> the geologic column
>
> 6. Dubois renounced Java man as a "missing link" and claimed it was just a
> giant gibbon
>
> 7. The Japanese trawler Zuiyo Maru caught a dead plesiosaur near New Zealand
>
> 8. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics began at the Fall
>
> 9. Archaeopteryx is a fraud
>
> 10. There are no beneficial mutations
>
> 11. No new species have been produced
>
> 12. Earth's axis was vertical before the Flood
>
> 13. Paluxy tracks prove that humans and dinosaurs co-existed
>
> 14. Darwin's quote about the absurdity of eye evolution from Origin of
> Species
>
> 15. Earth's division in the days of Peleg (Gen. 10:25) refers to
> catastrophic splitting of the continents
>
> 16. The Septuagint records the correct Genesis chronology
>
> 17. There are gaps in the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 so the Earth may
> be 10,000 years old or even more
>
> 18. Jesus cannot have inherited genetic material from Mary, otherwise He
> would have inherited original sin
>
> 19. The phrase "science falsely so called" in 1 Timothy 6:20 (KJV) refers to
> evolution
>
> 20. Geocentrism (in the classical sense of taking the Earth as an absolute
> reference frame) is taught by Scripture and Heliocentrism is anti-Scriptural
>
> 21. Ron Wyatt has found Noah's Ark
>
> 22. Canopy theory
>
> 23. There was no rain before the Flood
>
> 24. Natural selection as tautology
>
> 25. Evolution is just a theory
>
> 26. The speed of light has decreased over time
>
> 27. There are no transitional forms
>
> 28. Gold chains have been found in coal
>
> 29. Plate tectonics is fallacious
>
> 30. Creationists believe in microevolution but not macroevolution
>
> 31. The Gospel is in the stars

For amusement, I started to read AiG's response to Kent Hovind's
critique of the list, and I noticed some that aren't in your copy, such
as "Women have one more rib than men." (No they don't.) I have been
told that the man in the street in mediaeval times or thereabouts was
quite sure that women did have one more rib-bone, opportunities to
count 'em being relatively rare. Conversely, a modern translation
isn't sure it was a rib at all.

I presume http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dont_use.asp is
the current edition, and
http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/1011hovind.asp is the
Ham-Hovind deathmatch.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Answers in Genesis list of arguments Creationists shouldnt use
    ... Earth's axis was vertical before the Flood ... Darwin's quote about the absurdity of eye evolution from Origin of ... The Septuagint records the correct Genesis chronology ... Creationists believe in microevolution but not macroevolution ...
    (talk.origins)
  • The Answers in Genesis list of arguments Creationists shouldnt use
    ... We still see some Creationists using them, so I thought it was worthwhile to ... Earth's axis was vertical before the Flood ... Darwin's quote about the absurdity of eye evolution from Origin of ... The Septuagint records the correct Genesis chronology ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: What is a creationist?
    ... evolution and the nature of science. ... Creationists these days do not ... ancestors with other species. ... way the Book Of Genesis portrays. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Darwin and Punctuated Equilibrium
    ... evoled within a couple hundred years after the flood. ... If this isn't punctuated evolution, ... As sad as that sounds that is the state of the creationists ... dishonest ID scam are perpetrating a new scam that doesn't even ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: What do creationists think that evolutionary biologists do all day??
    ... journals that either specifically deal with evolution and paleontology ... Genesis is relating a RE-creation project. ... After the Flood our present biosphere ... So when I refer to myself as a "Old Earth-Young Biosphere Creatorist" ...
    (talk.origins)