Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: "Deadrat" <ephemera1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:17:21 GMT
<nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1126509954.655657.6080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> You would be scared none-the- less, which shows your bigotry.
Stop calling people names without the slightest reason.
> You
> should be scared that you are a crypto-racist by accepting Darwinism.
People who understand evolution, also understand that racial prejudice
has no basis in biology. They proclaim it, in fact. What is so hard to
get about this?
> That it is reasonable to interpret fitness as goodness, over
> interpeting it circular in terms of reproduction.
In English, something that has a good fit is snug, that is, it
matches what it fits into. For example, a population and its
environment. Goodness here has no moral connotation.
If you believe otherwise, then you believe that nuts that
fit snugly onto bolts are ethical and loose-fitting ones are
evil. Do you understand yet?
>
> What Hershey is mainly doing is merely repeating the definition of
> natural selection endlessly, many times emphasizing the definition with
> starsigns. That demonstrates more an inability to put the definition at
> issue, then it does patience to explain why the definition is the way
> it is, and not another way.
>
> ...along with their structural differences the national socialist
> doctrine recognizes their differing value......
>
> ....what is of value in the struggle for life is preserved.......
>
> And then you would object to this Nazism by saying fitness is not a
> good,
I would object to Nazis because they would kill people without reason.
When the Nazis were in power, my parents' generation objected to
them by defeating them in a war, not by "saying" anything.
You must be the only one here to take Nazi apologetics seriously.
Why is that?
> fitness determines how much an organism reproduces, and how much
> an organism reproduces determines it's fitness.
>
> regards,
> Mohammad Nor Syamsu
>
.
- References:
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: hersheyh
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: hersheyh
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: hersheyh
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: hersheyh
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: catshark
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- From: nando_ronteltap@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- Prev by Date: Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- Next by Date: Re: Also Intelligent Design
- Previous by thread: Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- Next by thread: Re: talk.origins faq Hitler claim part 3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading