Re: Teachable Theory of ID

On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 22:25:45 -0400, "Robert J. Kolker"
<nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>eldon1040 wrote:
>> After looking at Intelligent Design for several months I have come to
>> see the only problem the evolution believers have with Intelligent
>> Design is there is no theory and they have no hypotheses to test.
>
>Which is precisely why ID is balderdash. It can not be tested hence it
>cannot be falsified by any evidence.

But it may still be a fact...

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Kansas School Board
    ... > If that isn't evidence of intelligent design I don't know what is. ... There are other "coincidences", though, for example: ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.humor.jewish)
  • Proof of Intelligent Design
    ... You may have seen these already, but why is Ed Conrad silent? ... Surely this is the greatest evidence for Intelligent Design yet. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Commentary: Defending the concept of intelligent design
    ... I can accept a NATURALIST hypothesis of intelligent design as POSSIBLE, ... but there is no evidence for such a hypothesis at all. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Teachable Theory of ID
    ... >>> After looking at Intelligent Design for several months I have come to ... >>> see the only problem the evolution believers have with Intelligent ... is if there are added to it some specifications ... could be applied to any statement, no matter how empty of meaning. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Teachable Theory of ID
    ... >>see the only problem the evolution believers have with Intelligent ... >>Having graduated form a Kansas high school my mind was not cluttered ... >>with a lot of facts and data about evolution so it is easy for me then ... >>most to see how Intelligent Design works. ...
    (talk.origins)